© 2025 M. Anastasopoulou & Co. LLC. All rights reserved
In Cyprus, as in most common law jurisdictions, the principle of majority rule governs the internal management of companies. However, this principle must be balanced with adequate protection for minority shareholders, who may otherwise be vulnerable to exclusion, unfair treatment, or abuse of corporate powers by controlling interests.
While the Companies Law, Cap. 113 does not include an express statutory remedy for “unfair prejudice” as seen in the UK, it does provide a combination of common law remedies, statutory rights, and equitable relief to protect minority shareholders in both private and public companies.
Access to Information and Oversight
Although minority shareholders do not enjoy broad investigatory powers, they are entitled to:
Where reasonable requests for information are refused or obstructed, shareholders may apply to the court, especially where such denial is contrary to fiduciary or statutory duties.
Right to Convene General Meetings (Section 126, Cap. 113)
Under Section 126, shareholders holding at least 10% of the voting shares may demand that directors convene an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) to raise specific matters or propose resolutions.
If the directors fail to act within the required time, the shareholders are empowered to convene the meeting themselves, or apply to the District Court for an order enforcing their statutory right.
This is often a vital remedy when minority shareholders are excluded from management or key decisions.
Derivative Actions at Common Law
Where wrongdoing has been committed against the company (not the shareholder personally), but the board or majority refuse to act—often because they are implicated—a minority shareholder may apply to court to bring a derivative actionon behalf of the company.
Derivative actions are not codified in Cap. 113 but are available through common law principles (based on Foss v Harbottle and subsequent UK and Cypriot case law). Typical grounds include:
Court permission is required, and the action must clearly be in the interest of the company rather than the individual.
Winding-Up on Just and Equitable Grounds (Section 211(f), Cap. 113)
Cyprus does not have a dedicated “oppression” provision. Instead, minority shareholders facing sustained unfair treatment may apply under Section 211(f) for the company to be wound up by the court on the “just and equitable” ground.
This is a powerful yet exceptional remedy and applies especially in:
Courts are reluctant to order winding-up if a less drastic remedy exists (e.g., a buy-out), but the threat of dissolution often compels majority shareholders to negotiate.
Shareholders’ Agreements: Contractual Protections
Given the limits of statutory protections, minority shareholders are strongly advised to negotiate shareholder agreements that secure additional rights, such as:
In private companies, especially family-owned or founder-led ventures, these agreements are often the first and most effective line of protection.
Conclusion
Cyprus offers a mix of statutory and equitable remedies to minority shareholders, but these are most effective when combined with foresight and strong contractual planning. Whether through access to meetings, derivative actions, or the nuclear option of winding-up, the legal system provides tools for ensuring that minority interests are not ignored.
At M. ANASTASOPOULOU & CO LLC, we advise shareholders on asserting their rights, negotiating shareholder protections, and litigating internal company disputes where necessary. Whether you are a founder, investor, or family member in a privately held company, we offer strategic legal solutions tailored to your position.
If you are a minority shareholder seeking advice or facing exclusion from company affairs, contact us for confidential legal counsel.
Let’s Talk
We welcome your enquiry and would be delighted to discuss how our firm may be of assistance.